Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 15 years ago, 01/31/2010

User Stats

14
Posts
5
Votes
Joey Wang
  • Contractor
  • Emeryville, CA
5
Votes |
14
Posts

Making sense of financial impact between different amortization periods

Joey Wang
  • Contractor
  • Emeryville, CA
Posted

Today, I was reading up on different types of loans - specifically, a fully amortizing vs. partially amortizing loan. I encountered the following table illustration:

What I notice is that with amortizing period loan of 20yrs at 10yrs loan term vs a fully amortized loan, even though the partial amortizing loan monthly payment is 27% less, the total dollars paid out to it is only 19% more! I would have assumed that if I paid 27% less per month, then I would pay 27% more in the end. However, what this table is showing is that I can pay 27% less each month and only have to pay 19% more in the end, saving me a difference of at least 8%. This isn't even taking into account the higher interest deductions. So am I interpreting this table correctly - that I should always try to go for a longer amortizing period assuming the same loan term? Is there something I'm not catching?

Loading replies...