Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Kris Biz
  • San Diego, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Best use of cash - pay down debt or buy new property?

Kris Biz
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hi fellow investors,

I am trying to decide between paying down debt on my existing rental property or acquiring new rental property with the cash I have. Conventional wisdom says it is better to use leverage and acquire new property, and I have read articles on bigger pockets as well as heard this on podcast episodes. However, when I do the math, paying down debt looks quite appealing in my case. Here are the details.

Option 1 - pay down $211,000 debt on my rental property. At 3.875% rate, my monthly P+I is $1192. If I pay it off, I would save $14,304 per year. That is 6.77% cash on cash return!

Optio 2 - use this as a down payment (30%) on a new home purchase worth around 704k. Unfortunately, in my area (San Diego), even with 30% down you are barely cash flow neutral so there is no cash on cash return. If you consider principal reduction due to mortgage payments, you would get about 8k per year assuming 4.5% rate. This is an indirect cash on cash return of 3.8%.

Considering the higher cash on cash return, option 1 seems more appealing, so why would anyone choose to go with option 2? If I put down more for the purchase, I can improve the return on option 2 somewhat, but it still is lower than option 1. But you get less leverage by putting down more. 

Am I missing something? I am fairly new to real estate investment, so hoping experienced investors can share their insights. Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

In your area it is 6 to 1, 1/2 dozen to the other. For most investors paying down a 3.8% mortgage would be crazy. Cash easily earns a 10% or greater return when invested in a good market there for paying down a 3.8% loan is losing 6.2% return.

If throwing cash at a rental is the only way to make money it isn't really investing.

Having equity in a rental kills cash flow but if you have no cash flow to begin with there is very little reason to even own the property. It is not investing it is simply speculating on appreciation. You might as well be playing the stock market.

Loading replies...