Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Christopher McIntosh
  • Anchorage, AK
0
Votes |
7
Posts

Alaska vs Tennessee

Christopher McIntosh
  • Anchorage, AK
Posted

Hello there. I'm in an odd situation where I'm currently working and living in two separate states, and I'm looking to invest in my first house, owner occupied for the first year then renting it out, and I'm having trouble figuring out which way would be the best route. I'm looking for something that will be able to allow me to quit my current job and mostly survive on the rental income. The two separate areas I'm looking at are Knoxville, TN (where I'm from) where I can find a house or duplex for around 100k, and probably bring in a monthly rental income of around 800, and the other is Anchorage, AK where I work, and there it's much more expensive, say 300k for a duplex but it would bring in around 2500. Knoxville seems the safer bet since it's less in case something were to go wrong like maitenance issues or not finding a tenant, I could still afford the mortgage while Anchorage would bring in more cash flow but would be incredibly difficult to foot the full mortgage if I didn't have tenants. I'm currently making about 65k a year and I'll have about 30k for a down payment towards the place. Of course these are all ballpark numbers and specifics could vary greatly but I was just curious what you guys would recommend. Thank you! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,981
Posts
1,198
Votes
Bryan O.
  • Specialist
  • Lakewood, CO
1,198
Votes |
1,981
Posts
Bryan O.
  • Specialist
  • Lakewood, CO
Replied

@Christopher McIntosh where will you be in 5 years? If your plan is to head back to TN it would make visiting your property in Alaska very expensive. Typically when good management goes bad it will involve getting out there to assess the things they lied to you about. Plus, you may want to check up on the property yourself simply because you own it and want to feel secure.

Nowadays, there's an app for people to go by and check up on it for you, but some people are not comfortable with that either. Since it is owner-occupied financing, you can't really buy 3 in TN or 1 in AK, so if you are very comfortable with that I would lean towards Alaska first. Again, this will depend on your specific scenario, time horizons, exit strategy, teams, etc.

Loading replies...