Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Peter Perreault
  • San Diego, CA
0
Votes |
4
Posts

cash flow for MF owner/occupier

Peter Perreault
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hi BP. I'm new here and this is my first time posting. I'm posting to get  feedback from you all on the way I'm thinking about our first purchase and if there is anything critical I'm not considering.

We are looking for a first home purchase to be a mutli-family that we intend to occupy in San Diego, CA. Running the numbers (Rental Property Calculator) with all units rented at market prices leads to properties providing negative cash flow. From what I understand abut the market in San Diego, this is the norm for the neighborhoods we are searching.

Our long term goal is multiple MF properties providing positive cash flow. Near term, 1-3 years, we would like a 2nd property and to have a first property at least cash flow even when all units are rented. A first property at even cash flow in that timeline seems reasonable with a refinance to drop PMI and predicting future rental rates.

With us occupying one of the units in an MF property that would otherwise generate negative cash flow, I'm thinking about it as if we are paying a premium on rent. The benefit being progression towards our long term goal.

Is this reasonable? Do investors consider carrying a negative cash flow for a short time? How does that change if the investor is an occupier? Are there factors I'm not considering?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28
Posts
16
Votes
Jessica Riley
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Encinitas, CA
16
Votes |
28
Posts
Jessica Riley
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

Welcome to BP @Peter Perreault,

Negative cash flow and betting on appreciation vs. positive cash flow not counting on appreciation is a controversial topic on BP. 

Your idea of living in the first multi-family property investment is called house hacking.

Here are a few articles I found just on the bigger pockets website.

https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2013/11/0...

https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2014/11/2...

Bp podcast 94 and BP podcast 86 also address house hacking but I haven't watched them yet. 

Which part of San Diego are you looking?

My personal opinion (could be wrong): the housing market has been doing very well the last several years and maybe is just starting to slow down. I anticipate we are going to start seeing better investments with better cash flow popping up more so in the near future than now. If I were you I would not invest in something with negative cash flow because we are investing to make money not to lose money. (I realize you may save a bit on rent now, but in the long run it may not make sense because appreciation may never happen). I would wait to find a really good deal and then race to the sky from there.

Loading replies...