Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

15
Posts
3
Votes
Jeff Irwin
  • Jacksonville, FL
3
Votes |
15
Posts

Deceased Parents home is Co owned by myself and sister

Jeff Irwin
  • Jacksonville, FL
Posted

it is about to go on the market. 

However,  I was wondering if I should buy my sister out since I already have half the equity and turn it into a rental? Selling price would be approx 180,000 and rents for nice homes in our zip code are 1200-1400. That would be less than 1% -----If I had to buy the whole thing. But, since I already own half, I could buy her out for 90,000 + closing bla bla black

Please give me your thoughts.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,209
Posts
852
Votes
Ralph R.
  • Investor
  • Bethel, AK
852
Votes |
1,209
Posts
Ralph R.
  • Investor
  • Bethel, AK
Replied

Irwin, Jeff let it go to market and take the 90k and buy 2 or 3 PAYING properties. If you use 20 % of your equity as a down payment and walk away with enough cash to fund 2 more good properties you will have at best 2 winners and 1 mediocre property. Why would you do that? It makes little sense to tie up 90k(your equity) in a low yielding property when you could buy 2 or 3 paying ones. Cash in hand beats equity any day. That's why people do cash out re-fi's. They want the equity to purchase more property's. Your money earns a better cash on cash return if it's not setting all in one property. I.E. 3 leveraged properties should give you a higher cash on cash percentage than 1 property that you own 50% of. Also if your single property goes vacant 1 month you don't get any thing. If one of 3 goes vacant you still have the other 2 properties performing for you. I would never put all my eggs in one basket like that. RR

Loading replies...