Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Anthony Whitt
  • Accountant
  • Dayton, OH
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Multi-families better in rural or more urbanized areas?

Anthony Whitt
  • Accountant
  • Dayton, OH
Posted

My partner and I are in Dayton and are currently developing our investment criteria before we jump in. We are looking at the pros and cons of investing in a more dense location closer to the city or a location in  a little further away. This is what we're thinking through:

Larger pool of potential renters in urban areas, but may be more transient increasing turnover costs. May be able to get higher rents in urban areas, but there are higher costs such as property taxes.

Anyone have any thoughts or experiences or are we thinking through this too much?

Loading replies...