Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

340
Posts
188
Votes
Uriah D.
  • Investor
  • Apex, NC
188
Votes |
340
Posts

What would you do... Estate sale gone wrong

Uriah D.
  • Investor
  • Apex, NC
Posted
I had an estate sale under contract back in July 2014 in Raleigh NC and proceeded to close. One of the heirs after signing the contract decided they didn't want to sell and would not sign the deed. We waited and waited and contacted attorneys and waited and after a while found out that the problem heir had contacted another closing attorney about buy the property herself. During this time I still had a contract on the house. (I guess I still have it under contract now, the legal owner has changed though so it is pretty much useless.) We found out who the attorney was talked with him, he cancelled the closing and again informed the heir that she was in breach and could be sued. A couple days later the property was deeded over to the problem heir by the other heirs and we have been trying to reach her again to let her know the things she has done are not within the law. Question: would you sue the problem heir? All the heirs (roughly 6-7) or just let it go and eat the sunk costs. Anybody successfully won in this situation? Any lawyers you can suggest? Would love a lawyer that would handle the upfront costs to split any winnings we are awarded. 25-30k net profit on the deal and roughly 2k in sunk costs so far. 87k purchase 63k rehab.
  • Uriah D.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    718
    Posts
    912
    Votes
    John Chapman
    • Investor
    • Dallas, TX
    912
    Votes |
    718
    Posts
    John Chapman
    • Investor
    • Dallas, TX
    Replied

    Here are my thoughts (and I say this as a lawyer).  First, I think with $2k in sunk costs, it's worth at least speaking to a lawyer.  You'd be surprised what even a threatening lawyer will accomplish.  And just because a lawsuit is threatened, it doesn't mean you have to file it.   Second, the lawyer will let you know your chances of success and potential damages.  For example, he or she can advise you about whether you can sue for specific performance or just damages, how those damages are measured, whether attorney's fees are recoverable,  etc.  (Here in TX we can get specific performance.)  Third, I think you will have a very difficult time finding a lawyer to take it on contingency.  It just doesn't seem like there is enough at stake to get an attorney interested in that type of arrangement.  Plus, with individual defendants (as opposed to insurance companies or large corporations), there is always the issue of whether you can actually collect on any judgment.  

    Loading replies...