Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

81
Posts
10
Votes
Phil C.
  • Queens, NY
10
Votes |
81
Posts

Would you buy a house if buyer is responsible for U&O, COs, or certs?

Phil C.
  • Queens, NY
Posted

There are a few foreclosures I've been eyeing, however, very clearly states that buyer is responsible for any certifications, including Use & Occupancy, Certificate of Occupancy's, permits etc or anything else.   

I find myself very eager to just pull the trigger because of the price, but I'm sure there's a lot more than meets the eye and as a newb investor, it can be an fast way to exit the RE game. Any advice from the experienced folk?

Question is, if the house is even 50% off market value and looks cosmetically ready to rent out, would you go for it?  

Loading replies...