Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

21
Posts
3
Votes
Yates Snyder
  • Raleigh, NC
3
Votes |
21
Posts

Buy and Hold in rural areas a bad idea?

Yates Snyder
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

Hey, I'm looking at a SFH property right now that is being listed at 60k. It's fairly rural so I'm not sure how easy it is to find tenants out in those areas. An interesting thing is that the house must be sold along with another property which is listed at 80k also a 2/1, but it looks like both properties were passed on to a now married woman based on online deed info. So just from the sound of this does it sound like something people would generally have a double-take at? I know each house would have to stand on its own two feet when it comes to making an offer so when looking at it at first glance I figured I might be able to rent $500/month from each property (don't know anything about rural properties or their rent rates). Using the 50% rule I would have to offer 30k for the first home to cash flow almost $100 every month at that rent using a 30 yr loan... The second home if I bid 40k instead of their asking price of 80k i would still only scratch out $50 a month.... These numbers don't make any sense to me since even if i got the properties at half price, I would barely make anything. How do people even make money on SFH if they don't rent out the rooms individually? Don't even know right now haha

Loading replies...