Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 9 months ago, 03/24/2024

User Stats

267
Posts
297
Votes
Trevor Richardson
Agent
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Reno, NV
297
Votes |
267
Posts

NAR Settlement - Direct to Listing Agent Lost Power?

Trevor Richardson
Agent
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Reno, NV
Posted

Before the settlement and after this settlement, buyers always had the option to approach the listing agent directly with an offer, a power they've held all along. It’s interesting to see how people are reacting like this is a newfound power for buyers.

Fundamentally, nothing in this respect has changed. However, the landscape could shift significantly for unrepresented buyers. The potential 2.5% commission that might have been directed to the buyer's side is now potentially off the table.

This change prompts a critical question for unrepresented buyers: how does this alter your strategic advantage when approaching a sale without an agent? Previously, that 2.5% could have served as a powerful negotiating chip, either to bolster your offer or to pocket as a credit. The pre-settlement era seemingly encouraged buyers to self-represent, lured by the possibility of claiming the buy-side commission for themselves.

Now, with this incentive structure altered, it will be interesting to see how the dynamics and strategies of unrepresented purchasing change in the current market.

business profile image
Address Income
5.0 stars
16 Reviews

Loading replies...