Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
5
Votes
Ethan Kohler
Pro Member
  • New to Real Estate
  • Metro Detroit
5
Votes |
19
Posts

Older houses (1890-1940)

Ethan Kohler
Pro Member
  • New to Real Estate
  • Metro Detroit
Posted

Looking for any insight into purchasing 100 year old houses as rentals. I imagine it would not be that much of an issue if everything has been updated/renovated, but is that not so simple in identifying the underlying condition and materials? Mainly electrical and plumbing. 

I'm wondering if, in general, it may be wise to steer clear of these properties for greater inherent risk. Unless maybe its in a historic downtown district with a lot of potential (which is not the case for what I'm finding). 

Appreciate any comments. 

  • Ethan Kohler
  • Loading replies...