Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
1
Votes
Will H.
1
Votes |
7
Posts

10/6 ARM financing with 5% down

Will H.
Posted

Hey BP!

Anyone care to share their experience/wisdom with using a 10/6 ARM to finance their property? Seems pretty attractive if we are talking about a 10 year fixed rate that's about 1% lower than the current conventional 30 year fixed rates.

I am considering this as an option for my next house hack purchase. My strategy would be to use a 5% down payment on a SFR and am betting that rates will have a high chance of dropping within the next 10 years, which would give me the opportunity to either lock in the lower rate or do a cash out refinance on my other property and pay off the HELOC.


What are your thoughts? Am I understanding/thinking about this the right way or is there something that I'm missing because this seems like a logical move to me. Of course I understand the main drawbacks will be the variable rate adjustable every 6 months, but I ran a worst case scenario for the rate cap, and I should be able to still cover, and if rates end up going much higher after 10 years (I don't think this is likely) so I would be in a sticky situation.


Thank you in advance as always for your responses and time!

Loading replies...