Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

29
Posts
3
Votes
Amit Barman
  • Architect
  • Glen Burnie, MD
3
Votes |
29
Posts

Joint venture strategy Advice

Amit Barman
  • Architect
  • Glen Burnie, MD
Posted

I am working on a house flipping deal, where I am putting sweat equity as an architect and construction manager, and investor is putting his money. We talked about 60-40 profit sharing where 60 is his. But he likes to buy the property on his name not to the venture. Naturally I am not feeling comfortable with that condition, as after putting all my hard work, at the end of the day, there is always a possibility of him walking out alone not sharing the profit with me. I was wondering if anyone made such a deal, if so, what is the legal way to make this venture work, so that both party feel comfortable.

Loading replies...