Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
11
Votes
Bill Pollnow
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Neenah WI
11
Votes |
9
Posts

Properly vetting service professionals i.e. CPA's or bankers

Bill Pollnow
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Neenah WI
Posted

Hello Bigger Pockets world

I am hoping to get direction on a good way to properly vette a CPA, Banker or Insurance agent.  It is a constant struggle to find professionals that are a resource and not simply transactional.   For example, ALOT of CPA's will fill out/complete your tax paperwork when asked.  They will answer any question asked.  I would like to find a CPA that proactively asks me questions to base a strategy on for taxes.   To find this out UPFRONT is what I need help with.           

     If anyone has a good book recommendation I would love to hear that as well.    

     Thanks for listening.     

  • Bill Pollnow
  • Loading replies...