Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Boris Grushin
  • New to Real Estate
  • NJ
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Better to invest in a city with high or low renter percentage?

Boris Grushin
  • New to Real Estate
  • NJ
Posted

From an investor perspective is it better to buy a single family or small multifamily (4 and under) in a city with a high renter percentage of the population or a lower percentage? How low is too low where there isn't demand? Is 38% population being renters good because there is likely not as much supply, or will we have more vacancies because there aren't as many people looking as often.

Sorry if this sounds silly but we're just starting to look at where we want to invest and are trying to make sure we are thinking about things in the right way.

Thanks

Loading replies...