Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago,

User Stats

15
Posts
5
Votes
Sam Compton
  • New to Real Estate
  • St.Louis Missouri
5
Votes |
15
Posts

Buying criteria for rental properties St. Louis metro area

Sam Compton
  • New to Real Estate
  • St.Louis Missouri
Posted

Hello all,

I am in the market for my first rental property. I use the BP calculator for rentals on almost a daily basis. I know the market is tough right now. Its seems nearly impossible to find anything on the MLS that cashflows.

I have been allocating the following for expenses

5% vacancy

5% Expenses/repairs

5% cap x

10% property management

Then the usual PITI

I feel like these are the numbers I should be using and should stick too, but wanted to hear from others in the area who are actively buying.

Let me know what you think?

Thanks,

Sam

Loading replies...