Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Eugene C.
  • Investor
  • Morocco
1
Votes |
16
Posts

20 year mortgage vs 30 year mortgage

Eugene C.
  • Investor
  • Morocco
Posted

Hello All,

I'm new to REI and I am busy negotiating my first deal at the moment. I'm starting small, so it's a single apartment unit, which I plan to rent out and hold indefinitely.

Whilst preparing my mortgage finance application I have been giving some thought to whether I should apply for a 20 or 30 year loan period. My thinking is as follows:

All else being equal and assuming I can secure the same interest rate for either loan periods, a 30 year loan will have a lower monthly repayment, giving me higher monthly cashflow. The downside is obviously increased total interest payment over the life term of the loan.

A 20 year loan will obviously have the opposite effect.

My question is, given that my strategy is "buy-to-let", am I correct in my thinking that the advantage of more robust cashflow from day 1 with a 30 year loan is more desirable than the lower total interest payment over a 20 year period?

Thank you in advance for all input.

Eugene

Loading replies...