Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Mike Knab
  • Contractor
  • Loveland, OH
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Corporate Tree Work Liability Concerns and Overall Budget

Mike Knab
  • Contractor
  • Loveland, OH
Posted

I work for a large tree company that works on a National Scale in the Corporate realm.  

The question I have is this:  

I am finding that many investment companies are willing to accept a large amount of liability with tree issues due to "annual planned budget per location" over clearing out the issues and tapping into the larger money pool of the investment company.  In my opinion it is such a risk to leave even the small issues in regards to trees because the tree isn't "dead" or "dying".  I understand budget is different per location an investment company owns, but wouldn't it make more sense to rid the overall investment company of almost all liability than dance with disaster? 

I guess in plain words: Why are companies willing to risk a liability like this?

Loading replies...