Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sacramento, California United States
4
Votes |
8
Posts

Threatening letter buyer's attorney for breach of contract

Account Closed
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sacramento, California United States
Posted

I'm unlicensed architect, I sold a duplex with entitlements for a lot split and infill single-family. I created the construction documents for the proposed design but chose not to pursue development and sold the property instead. The design of the single-family was not part of the purchase and sale agreement for the property or advertised as such. As per the contract I delivered copies of all the drawings in my possession but did not release the rights to use them or agree to transfer the digital files. 

The contract was for the purchase and sale of the property and nowhere in the contract does it include assignment of intellectual property rights. I offered to cooperate with the buyer and share the drawings for a reasonable fee. 

Today, I received a letter from his attorney requesting I assign all intellectual property rights to my design or agree to damages ($250,000) or to mediation. 

So, who here has gone to mediation? From my perspective, the buyer would rather compensate their lawyer for my design than to compensate the designer. 

Happy Friday, thank you for your thoughts. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,199
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,199
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

I'm not a legal professional, so take this for what it's worth...

I would recommend that you find a good real estate litigation attorney, use the upfront consultation to determine whether the other party has a case or not, and then go from there.  If the attorney says that the other party might have a case (for whatever reason), it may just be easier to transfer the intellectual property.  If the attorney says they have no case, then you need to decide how much time/effort/money you are willing to expend to fight. 

It's not a fun process, even when you win.  I spent over two years fighting for $50,000 that I was owed.  I got it, but I'm not sure the two years of wasted time and energy was worth it. 

The other big question you need to ask the attorney is whether you'd be entitled to legal fee reimbursement should you win the case -- this is likely addressed in the contract.  Assuming you'd be entitled to attorney fees, it may be worth a strongly worded letter from your attorney laying out your side and reminding the other party and his attorney that it will get expensive should they pursue the case and lose.

There's a good chance that the other party figured it was worth $200 to have his attorney write a letter in the hopes of scaring you.  He may be prepared to back off should you resist in any way.

Loading replies...