Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on .

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Bill McCoy
  • Bainbridge Island, WA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

partnership with spec house builder

Bill McCoy
  • Bainbridge Island, WA
Posted

I have two ready-to-go lots in good location. A spec house builder with a good track record (25+ SFRs in small local community over last 8 years, all sold and some since resold with good appreciation) some access to bank financing) proposes to partner with me on the following general basis: I supply land to the deal at fair value, I supply all the hard money for construction at 12%, we split the profit or loss from sale 50/50, they act as GC on cost + 2% basis. The upside for me per their proforma (less risk-free return on my money) would be roughly 50% boost over what I would get by just selling the lots. Obviously this would require a considerable amount of trust that they would see the project through and also that they would not be padding payments to subs but aside from the trust factors (which could be mitigated to some extent by appropriate legal terms) does this seem like a reasonably fair arrangement? Local market is very strong now but could be nearing the end of cyclical boom so there would be downside exposure but if I ended up having to carrying one or both homes for a couple years that wouldn't be outrageous.