Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Birmingham, MI
54
Votes |
179
Posts

Financing tear-downs: land value> $/sq ft

Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Birmingham, MI
Posted
In hot markets with a lot of investment happening in new construction how do non-cash buyers confront appraisal issues where the land value exceeds a price per square foot value using a sales comparable approach? I am already starting to look for another lot to buy and hold for a few years as a rental with a future ambition to build another personal residence. The challenges I faced financing my current tear down competing with builders paying a premium with cash were daunting. Anyone see appraisers defer to a replacement cost approach for these types of tear-downs to more accurately reflect fair value? I realize this is unique in that most people building will probably finance the land (which could include a tear down) and improvements in a single step rather than a two step process.