Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Birmingham, MI
54
Votes |
179
Posts

custom home- land at historical cost versus fair market value

Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Birmingham, MI
Posted

I am evaluating a prospective build of a custom home.

My wife and I purchased a tear-down for a rather deep discount to the market value. It was an REO and both the bank and listing agent understated the GLA by around 200 square feet. At prices of $200/sq. foot in my area for these small homes (new construction nears $300/sq. foot) I can't help but wonder how $40,000 of value appeared out of thin air ($200/foot X 200 feet). In addition to the extra square footage, it was purchased for a discount of about $10,000. In total we have a home that we could net $50,000tomorrow if we sold (excluding transaction costs).

Construction Costs (150/sq. foot): 3,000 sq. foot home- $450,000

Land costs: Historical- $300,000; Fair Value- $350,000

Total cost- ?????

Tearing the house down effectively eliminates my new found $50k in equity. Even though it’s only on paper, doesn’t tearing the house down represent an opportunity cost of not selling and finding another lot (in the amount of $50,000)?

How should I be thinking about my land costs given the scenario?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

452
Posts
309
Votes
Lynn Currie
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
309
Votes |
452
Posts
Lynn Currie
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Replied

Hi @Account Closed ,

If you decide to develop, think of your land cost as an actual expense. Ignore FMV.

Your math would be as follows:

   $300,000 - Land (this is what you paid, right?)
+ $450,000 - Construction Cost
--------------------
  $750,000 

The answer to your second question is where you, as a developer, make a decision. Yes, the $50k is lost opportunity cost. 

What is the potential sales price of the home that you just built for $750,000? Is it $1,000,000? $800,000? If it's $800,000, developing doesn't make sense. If it's $1M then you might want to think about it. 

For example, it would take 5 $50k lots to make the $250k that you can make in the $1M sales price scenario. Is that doable? Is the time frame the same? Are you more comfortable with that strategy? 

There's no right answer, just the one that you feel is right for you and your market.

Hope that helps,

Lynn

Loading replies...