Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

71
Posts
17
Votes
Kenneth C.
  • Philadelphia, PA
17
Votes |
71
Posts

New Construction Square Footage Cost

Kenneth C.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Hello,

I close on a 1000 sq. ft. lot this week. I've been conversing with several architects over the past several months while we work through issues with the city and the parcel's title (iykyk). My intention initially was to maximize the cash flow and build a triplex. However, it seems the most feasible option would be to build a duplex. With that in mind, I initially was basing my construction cost on the footprint of the lot (i.e., $160.00 * 1000 Sq. Ft). Even with a higher per square footage charge that I'm using, I've been told that isn't the best way to estimate your cost. It was suggested to me that a more accurate way is to base it on the square footage of the proposed building. Do you all have any insight on this?

Looking forward to your responses!

Cheers!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,075
Posts
5,129
Votes
Scott Mac
  • Austin, TX
5,129
Votes |
5,075
Posts
Scott Mac
  • Austin, TX
Replied

Hi Kenneth,

Regarding the structure.

Side by side is a better duplex layout than over/under if you can manage it on the lot.

No complaints about loud upstairs renters in a side by side.

Also think noise reduction between the units, inside and outside, as well as privacy between renters.

Loading replies...