Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago, 01/15/2021

User Stats

2
Posts
2
Votes
John Quan
2
Votes |
2
Posts

What are typical GP economics for syndication/fund?

John Quan
Posted

I understand that GP economics will vary from deal to deal and they can always be negotiated. But does anyone have any resources I can review to better understand how things are typically split between the GPs?

For example, if I'm able to raise $1,000,000 of the $10,000,000 total raise -- what type of % of the GP should I expect to have? Assuming the other GPs will have a much more active role in managing the assets after acquisition? Would I be entitled to the acquisition fee, asset management, and disposition?

Would the economics change if the capital raised went towards a syndication vs fund? I could see the splits being worse of someone who is not actively managing for a fund given the likely longer duration of asset management and hold time.

Loading replies...