Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago, 05/31/2013

User Stats

113
Posts
10
Votes
Peter Fokas
  • Investor
  • Ridgewood, NJ
10
Votes |
113
Posts

Looking at 4plex that records show was built in 1785

Peter Fokas
  • Investor
  • Ridgewood, NJ
Posted

Looked at a 4plex that records show was built in 1785. Went through house and condition seems decent. Its definitely an old house but does not seem that old. Perhaps more like 100 years old instead of 230 years! The numbers seem to make sense but concerned about the age of the house. Any suggestions to help mitigate risk.

Loading replies...