Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago, 02/02/2020

User Stats

21
Posts
8
Votes
Thomas Loggins
8
Votes |
21
Posts

General question regarding 506b/506c passive investment platforms

Thomas Loggins
Posted

Like any investor "wanna-be", I read a lot and listen to podcasts of syndicators and sponsors (GPs, I assume) who pool capital from passive investors to target value-add multifamily opportunities. 

While I have significant experience on the debt side of multifamily real estate, I don't have a lot of experience on the dynamics of syndicating equity. I understand in general how equity relationships work (GP vs. LP, active vs. passive, preferred returns / promote, etc.) as I have to review operating agreements at times and I have reviewed promote waterfalls. But I am not an expert.

My question is: Why would these online, value-add investing platforms need or want to reach out to "mom and pop" investors, accredited or not, to raise capital? 

In most of the deals I see, underwrite, asset-manage from a lender perspective, I see the same sponsors raising equity from the same known investors deal after deal, without the need to reach out to the general public for equity contributions. I will note that pretty much ALL of the deals we finance are institutional-quality properties with exit strategies of either 1) refi via long-term, permanent takeout (life companies), or 2) sale / disposition to institutional investors.

So as I individually attempt begin my personal investing career (currently in learning mode with capital ready to deploy), I understand that I can't just walk into a room full of sophisticated, savvy and experienced investors and announce that I'd like to participate in a "sure thing", ground-up 350-unit, class A apartment building in midtown ATL. I get it. 

But why would these online, value-add strategy platforms need or want my equity contribution? Do they not have access to the more sophisticated investors? Does the equity that would be provided by such savvy and experienced investors demand demand higher returns than mom and pop can demand (i.e. more expensive equity)?  What else?

Thanks in advance for any comments.

Loading replies...