Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

718
Posts
912
Votes
John Chapman
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
912
Votes |
718
Posts

Are there actually properties that you would not buy at any price?

John Chapman
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Posted

I've been doing some direct marketing to small apartment buildings and have come across one or two where when I look at the expenses and rent (based on what I perceive to be reasonable assumptions), I would not offer a $1 on them because their expenses are likely to exceed income. The example I'm thinking of was a D (with a capital D) property, all 1/1's, all bills paid, including cable, no central a/c, 20% vacancy (per owner so probably higher), lots of evictions, and all the other apartments were offering massive rental incentives. No reasonable way to turn the place around because it's in such a crummy area. Maybe you could goose cash flow by cutting cable, but then I suspect that would probably cause more problems than it's worth. Also, the owner admitted that you can't push utilities on the tenants because they can't get accounts (can't afford the deposits). The place had already been renovated, too, and was at market rent.

Has anyone else come across a property like this, that is, one that likely won't make money. I don't have a ton of experience in this area, but was kind of surprised by my conclusion. I suspect you are more likely to come across this in with "all bills paid" scenario.

I struggle with the concept that there is no value to the place, other than perhaps land. I just don't want to be looking at these properties too narrowly and missing opportunities. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,127
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,127
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Any place where the population is declining has good potential for such buildings. An income producing property can't produce any income if nobody lives there. Detriot (sorry to pick on Detriot) had a population of 1.8 million in 1950 and now has a population under 800,000. That's a lot of empty houses. Out here in the west are many ghost towns where whatever supported the town went away.

Loading replies...