Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
0
Votes
David Kimball
  • Jersey City, NJ
0
Votes |
17
Posts

Joint Venture with nebulous exit strategy

David Kimball
  • Jersey City, NJ
Posted

I have been offered an opportunity to invest in a duplex in a good area in Jersey City with someone who knows what he's doing. He found the deal through a marketing effort, and has it locked up at a great price.

The thing is, he wants me to put up 100% of the purchase. And then we would split the profits 50-50.

Now, the exit strategy is not totally clear. If we flip it immediately, then the profit division is clear (in fact I would be getting a very good return on my money for not doing anything). If we hold it and share landlording responsibilities however, first of all how will we decide who does what to make it fair? And secondly wouldn't I be getting a bit short-changed by paying for the whole house and getting only half the cashflow?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,128
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,128
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Well, I would want to be very clear on the exit strategy up front. A 50/50 split between the do-er and the money guy is pretty standard. But that's for a fix and flip. I honestly think for buy-and-hold where the money guy is in for 100% of the cash, the cash flow is more like 90% to the money guy. That's because you own 100% of the equity and the do-er is just doing the PM job. PM's typically charge 10% of collected rents. So, I can argue that he should just collect the 10% and leave it at that.

If you're going to do this, you need to get very, very, very clear on a lot of details. If its a fix and flip (I would strongly recommend doing this), its in and out. Set a time limit. After the time limit, ownership reverts 100% to you, just like it would with a hard money loan. For that matter, doing it as a loan would be cleaner for you. If its buy an hold, who makes decisions? What if more money is needed? Does it truly cash flow (i.e., if he's taking a PM cut, you're looking at a 50% rule property.)

Is he making money anywhere else? He should not be, frankly. If he's being the general contractor, and taking a general contractor's fee and then getting 50% of the profit, he's double dipping. Any costs he or some company he controls come out of his 50% of the profit.

Loading replies...