Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

151
Posts
143
Votes
Michael Glaspie
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • Fayetteville, NC
143
Votes |
151
Posts

Simplest way to pay off a partner? Help me decide!!

Michael Glaspie
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • Fayetteville, NC
Posted

Coming up on my next deal. I'm in negotiations and I am looking for the best way to approach it. I am short by about $50,000 to purchase the property. I have found ways to raise the capital. The internal debate is which method would be simplest; borrow the money as a private loan to purchase and use cash flow to pay off. Or allow the individual to partner and take an equitable share of the profits until I can pay them off. 

There are pros and cons to both. The private money loan option will significantly reduce cash flow but would allow me to retain 100% ownership and decision making power. Whereas the partnership portion would allow us to take it down much quicker and with substantially more reserves, but it would more deliberation for each decision to be made on the property. 

All in all, I feel comfortable with both options and have a little more time before the decision needs to be made, so I am curious to what you all may think. Or what experiences you have been through that would push you one way or another. 

Loading replies...