Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

60
Posts
12
Votes
Vlad Denisov
  • Glendale, CA
12
Votes |
60
Posts

Interest only loans?

Vlad Denisov
  • Glendale, CA
Posted

Hello everyone!

Question to people who own 16+units - what type of loan do you use? Do you always go with interest only or not? What is your train of thought behind this?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

390
Posts
599
Votes
Serge S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
599
Votes |
390
Posts
Serge S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
Replied

@Vlad Denisov the use of IO debt is used for very specific type deal. Generally a value add where there is no cash flow during the value add process. It also creates another market risk risk to the deal, especially today. In a stabilized deal, the lender will want the investor to show a minimum debt service coverage, this is a key metric for them as it shows the asset's ability to carry that debt. 

During the golden age of multifamily 2010-2015 this was actually a pretty rare practice as most cities were trading at equilibrium historical cap rates and the asset had the ability to carry the debt load. Come 2015 few deals could project the 7-10% COC a sponsor needed to make the deal work and competition among banks brought the IO to the 3-6 years we see today.

This presents its own set of problems especially in cities where multifamily is in the hypersupply side of the cycle. Everyone understands that once IO expires principle payments begin but what is not talked about is that effect on COC. I ran these numbers on my last deal and it came in the ballpark of eating 5% in the year of reset and thats with a stable interest rate environment. This means that if the asset doesn't have a minimum 5% COC it can't pay debt. As a sponsor or investor you better be pretty damn confident in how fast you can turn units, increase rents, decrease economic loss to lease etc; NO room for error. This is not what I see. I see less than 10% economic loss to lease, 30% year one rent bumps, renovations done in one year. Essentially your buying an asset running perfectly and betting you can run it even better. I

There are other products where IO on front end combined with longer term debt can meet both purposes. Unfortunately today the IO in conjunction with Bridge financing is the only way to make these deals work on paper. 

Loading replies...