Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

37
Posts
13
Votes
Vasundhara Ranjani
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
13
Votes |
37
Posts

Class A vs Class B vs Class C Properties - Pros & Cons

Vasundhara Ranjani
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
Posted

As the title suggests, what are the pros and cons of investing Class A vs. B vs. C properties?

I understand that A properties might be less 'headache' due to better tenants but if it's all about the cash-flow, wouldn't a majority of people go for C or even C-/D+ properties?

I'd like to get some perspectives from both newer as well as seasoned investors on the pros and cons of each type of rental property.

An example I'd like to give is a commercial deal that came across my desk - a NNN lease for a very well-known nationwide business for 10 years with two five year extensions (so approx. 20 year lease). The price was ~ $2.5M and assuming a "regular" commercial loan, after the debt-service, the cash flow was just ~ $3K per month.

Now why on earth would anyone put $625K down for something that returns $3K/month? That's a 5.76% return and I can get that all day in the market without risking much. 

Whereas if there is a large Class-C apartment building for a similar price (~ $2.5M), the return could be ~ 20% (or more in many cases) which definitely would beat the market most years. All these figures are 'net' by the way.

Can someone explain the logic of dumping $625K into something that gives 5.76% vs. something that gives > 20% for the same amount?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,454
Posts
30,143
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,143
Votes |
17,454
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

Its just a matter of risk, assessing it and deciding on your risk tolerance. Class A is low risk, Class D high risk and everything in between. This is clearly illustrated in the yield of the assets and market. Yield across all asset types is really a measure of risk, whether in real estate, bonds, divideneds etc. Most people mistake yield as a measure of return, which it is not.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
44 Reviews

Loading replies...