Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Tyrrell Levine
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Dual agency mischief in commercial real estate?

Tyrrell Levine
Posted

Hi all, I'm trying to understand how the big commercial real estate agents (CBRE, JLL, etc) market deals. For example, if I want to sell a five-unit multifamily in Washington DC, it seems these agencies will market almost exclusively to their own clients -- and thus end up on both sides of the deal (dual agency). 

Is this how it actually works? If so, it seems like they are not marketing to the vast majority of potential buyers (because even these big players have <20% market share in any given market). And thus how are they achieving the highest possible selling price?

I'm also wondering if working with a smaller listing agent might be a way to avoid this dual agency problem. Any insights from the BP community would be greatly appreciated. 

Loading replies...