Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

242
Posts
99
Votes
Bryan Zuetel
  • Attorney
  • Orange County, CA
99
Votes |
242
Posts

California syndicators/operators and the FTB tax arm

Bryan Zuetel
  • Attorney
  • Orange County, CA
Posted

Because of the long arm of the California Franchise Tax Board and what they consider doing business in California, my LLC will be deemed to be doing business in California, since I'm managing the LLC from California, even if if the property is located outside of California. By doing business in California, the LLC may be subject to the heavy LLC franchise taxes of California.

For any syndicators/operators based in California, have you faced any resistance from potential investors to the LLC being deemed doing business in California and paying California LLC franchise taxes?

  • Bryan Zuetel
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    8,137
    Posts
    3,671
    Votes
    Basit Siddiqi
    • Accountant
    • New York, NY
    3,671
    Votes |
    8,137
    Posts
    Basit Siddiqi
    • Accountant
    • New York, NY
    Replied

    @Bryan Zuetel

    I find it that most investor's will not care whether the fund pay's the California LLC Franchise tax. The minimum fee is $800. If the fund has 10 investors - the fee is $80 per person. Just factor it as a cost of doing business


    While California deems the LLC is doing business in California doesn't necessarily mean that the fund will have California state sourced income.

    If the LLC files a partnership return and all the payroll, property and sales are outside California - The LLC will not have any California state sourced income. As a result - the investors of the fund should get a California K-1 that is blank and they should not have a filing requirement with CA.

    business profile image
    Basit Siddiqi CPA
    4.9 stars
    75 Reviews

    Loading replies...