Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
6
Votes
James Rader
  • Pearland, TX
6
Votes |
10
Posts

CoC and equity shares in MF syndication

James Rader
  • Pearland, TX
Posted

I have an opportunity to invest in my first MF as a passive investor. The sponsors are putting 10% down for a 25% equity share. That means that the other 90% down only gets a 75% equity stake in the deal... basically your dollar has less equity power than the sponsors. Here's where I get lost: the COC return as a percentage would no longer be the same for the sponsor and investor, right? For the sponsors, it took less money to earn the equity share, thus a higher COC.... and the opposite is true for the investor. The offering I was given shows the projected COC return for investors, but not sure if it's been corrected for this.

Hoping I framed my question well enough and someone can clarify.  Thanks, BP! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

10
Posts
6
Votes
James Rader
  • Pearland, TX
6
Votes |
10
Posts
James Rader
  • Pearland, TX
Replied

I don’t think I’m making it more complicated than it needs to be.  I’m leaving no stone unturned and making sure I fully understand every aspect of the deal so there aren’t surprises later.  

For anyone still following, the GP’s accountant had already accounted for it.  I just reviewed the offering again.  The net levered cash flow was reduced by 25% prior to the investors metrics being calculated.  It’s all correct... I’m satisfied now!

Loading replies...