Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Paul Etchison
  • Frankfort, IL
0
Votes |
3
Posts

What do you think about this Joint Venture structure?

Paul Etchison
  • Frankfort, IL
Posted

Currently, I engage on flips with my brother in laws who own a construction company. I have zero construction experience. We formed an LLC and split profits 3 ways. I want to reposition some multi units and am looking at two in particular that I have potential. I don't have construction knowledge so I am scared to do a deal without them. They don't have good credit or the money to fund the deal. I do.

I was thinking,  I buy the property 100% in my name, all rents and income will be mine while we are holding,  they will provide the GC work and I will pay them for it a normal rate.  Then...on the sale,  We split the profits of the property (50/50),  but out of their 50, they have to reimburse 50% of the GC and improvement costs.

I think this is fair as they have zero risk (no money in), get a job to do and get paid for,  yet they have incentive to keep costs down and improve value as well as help me plan whether or not it is a good deal at all.  

What do you think?  Anyone have a better arrangement similar to this? Does this seem fair to you?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

591
Posts
807
Votes
Spencer Gray
  • Syndication Expert and Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
807
Votes |
591
Posts
Spencer Gray
  • Syndication Expert and Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
Replied

I agree with @Patrice Penda

How many GC's have you gotten quotes from?

There's no reason to give up your profits to a GC just because they know construction or they are your brother in law. I mean, they better know construction (that's what you are hiring them for and it's their job)! If you get to a point where you are confident managing contractors then you can become the GC and sub everything out, but until then what you pay a GC for is to understand the construction process and to hire the appropriate and qualified subs - that is the job you pay them to do, not extra. If they bring more to the deal (guarantee debt, found the deal, fund the deal, provide his time/services at cost etc) then you could give them something (5-30%). 50% is more like you put up the money and he does ALL the work, or visa-versa. There are much better ways to incentivize (bonuses for on time completion, penalties for not hitting deadlines).

If your brother in-law is the GC at full cost and he takes 50% of sale proceeds he is taking advantage of your inexperience. Save your equity for investors and yourself, tell your brother in law to find his own deals!

Also make sure you are using a different LLC for each project.

Loading replies...