Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

35
Posts
20
Votes
Evan Salvador
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Roseville, CA
20
Votes |
35
Posts

Small MF appraisal and comps question

Evan Salvador
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Roseville, CA
Posted

Hi All, 

I'm going under contract with a triplex in Indianapolis. I tried researching this but it seems to be conflicting information and I'm hoping someone experienced can clear this up for me. I've read that MFs are appraised and valued based on NOI or income approach. But then I found info saying that the income approach is usually used if it's 5+ units and anything under is comped like SF homes. If that's the case, how do you get market comps of triplexes? You have to compare to with other triplexes in the same neighborhood recently sold?

  • Evan Salvador
  • Loading replies...