Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

291
Posts
20
Votes
Devin Mann
  • Investor
  • Ascutney, VT
20
Votes |
291
Posts

Reasonable to get a 5-10 unit Multi-fam,100% OPM for first deal?

Devin Mann
  • Investor
  • Ascutney, VT
Posted

Im not qualified for FHA since i dont have two years of tax returns....

If i form an llc and syndicate money, is it reasonable to get close to 100% funding on it even if its my first deal?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,789
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,789
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

@Devin Mann I'm not trying to be negative, I'm really not. It's different when it's *your* money that you're putting into a deal as a passive investor. Yes, the property matters. Yes, the lead in the syndication matters. Yes, the track record or returning capital to investors matters. Yes, it matters that the lead has skin in the game. It all matters. And, yes, every single other syndicator out there (with a track record and with skin in the game) talks about the same "good ROI".

Let's say they give a 7% preferred return.  I have to add the risk of your lack of real estate experience.  I have to add the risk of not having money financially in the deal.  I have to add the risk of you never have returned capital to investors before.  By the time I de-risk the deal through increasing my preferred return, what's left for you?

Again, you're asking if it's *reasonable* and I've seen nothing at all that tells me why I should choose "Mann Syndication".  And why I'm telling you this?  It's because I don't think what you're proposing is "free."  So far, I'm imagining that accredited investors are all going to go the route of experienced syndicators.  You can go after non-accredited investors through word-of-mouth (no advertising) and you'll probably have to set up a private placement memorandum.  Google what it costs to set up a private placement memorandum.  See a sampling of the costs and the fees you'll pay to an attorney.  Don't take my word for it. 

Maybe you can get away with doing an LLC where members have voting rights proportional to their investment. Your position is subordinate to their so you lose control of your investment. I don't think you want that. Who knows, maybe it doesn't matter to you. Most syndicator leads (if for efficiency if nothing else) would want control and outside (passive) investors don't want the (perceived or real) liability of being an managing member.

All of that said, I'm no lawyer, this isn't legal advice, maybe there's some simple almost-free way to set it up.   

Loading replies...