Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
147
Votes |
624
Posts

Solving the negative cash flow issue with LA rentals

Account Closed
  • Professional
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted

So you are told its impossible to cash flow in LA. Actually you can, it just requires slightly more cash down. You can also try lowering expenses, although that might barely make a difference.

If data from Zillow is correct, current median listing price for a home in LA is about $749,000. You can almost forget about a nothing down purchase... with a 20% down payment, 4.7% 30-year conventional mortgage rate and financing the principal of: $599,200, your monthly mortgage payment would equal: $3108. 

But median LA rent for a home appears to be about $3500. We already see some problems here. To break even, you would have to keep total expenses at 11.21% or $392 per month -- thats a long ways from 50% suggested by the 50% rule. Using estimated expenses of 45%, the result is a monthly negative cash flow of $1,182.68. 

So owner would have to incur an additional out of pocket expense of $14,192.13 per year, just to maintain property and hoping property appreciates in value in excess of this amount just to soften the hit.

Median LA Listing Price           $749,000
20% Down Payment           $149,800
Loan Principal           $599,200
Mortgage Rate                 4.70%
Term (months)                    360
Mortgage Payment                $3,108
Median LA Rent                $3,500
Avg Expense 45%               $1,575
Net Operating Income               $1,925
Gross Income Per Year             $42,000
Cap Rate            3.0841%
Cash Flow        $(1,182.68)

In order to break even, and we aren't even talking positive cash flow yet, you would need a down payment of about 50.45% of the property value to significantly reduce loan principal. 

Example: holding all else constant,  50.45% of the $749,000 in cash for the down would reduce loan principal to about $371,165 which then enables property owner to break even. 


Median LA Listing Price            $749,000
50.45% Down Payment            $377,835
Loan Principal            $371,165
Mortgage Rate                 4.70%
Term (months)                    360
Mortgage Payment               $1,925
Median LA Rent               $3,500
Avg Expense 45%               $1,575
Net Operating Income               $1,925
Gross Income Per Year            $42,000
Cap Rate            3.0841%
Cash Flow               $ - 0

Is a 50% down payment weird or normal in your market? 

So if you thinking about scooping up a rental in LA, the real question is, how much down you planning to play with?

Loading replies...