Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

30
Posts
9
Votes
Zack Bloom
  • Greenwich, CT
9
Votes |
30
Posts

Apartment Investing: 100 duck-sized horses or 1 horse-sized duck

Zack Bloom
  • Greenwich, CT
Posted

Trying to create a metaphor here based on the popular Reddit Question: "Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses or 1 horse sized duck" and draw parallels to apartment vs. single family home investing. You can go with 1 upper-mid market single family home and make decent margins if you know what to look for or you can go after a 20-unit apartment and make small margins on each unit but do well if you get it a full capacity. So that's my question, would you rather go after a cheaper 20-unit that takes more selling, more maintenance, and more marketing but is an overall safer bet, or fix and rent a nice single family home but risk overpaying or having your only unit vacant too long. Let's assume hypothetically your seed capital is the same for both. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

138
Posts
130
Votes
Rodney Miller
  • Lender
  • Oklahoma City, OK
130
Votes |
138
Posts
Rodney Miller
  • Lender
  • Oklahoma City, OK
Replied

I currently own about 100 rental houses. I am also researching and looking into purchasing my first Multi-Family property. What I can tell you is that you're most likely gonna buy the SFH's below market value. I purchased 3 last week all around 60 cents on the dollar ( all in with repairs). Every time I buy a SFH I try to have 20-30k in equity at the get go.

Another point is that when you are buying houses at 60 cents on the dollar you can usually find a local bank to finance 90-100% of the deal because the loan to value is low ( very little money out of pocket)

You won't find many Multi-Family selling at that kind of discount due to the fact that you are dealing with a more sophisticated seller. That being said, It took me 7 years to accumulate my SFH portfolio and costs thousands of dollars in advertising ( bandit signs, postcards, internet, etc..) It also took a ton of feet on the ground taking phone calls, weeding out the bad deals, Meeting with 5 sellers in person only to get one good deal. Very hard to scale SFH model.

I've always steered away from Multi-Family because honestly it kind of intimidated me and I knew that I was competing with well funded institutional buyers and I would be able to buy at the discount that I am accustom to with SFH's. It would also require me to come up with a sizeable down payment which was a new concept to me.

After taking the time to research Multi-Family properties it makes much more sense to me.  What I thought were barriers to entry are easily overcome with the right strategy.  And even though you are gonna pay market value or close to market value you can increase that value substantially on the right deals.  In summation if I could go back 7 years I would definitely go Multi-Family.

Loading replies...