Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 8 years ago,
California 4 Unit - Epitome of CA Excess?
I thought I'd share this report I just generated.
The report is here, incidentally:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5YbSRYrt3Q8WXN1...
We're looking at, among other things, opportunities in Orange County for triplex and fourplex properties that we can attain using fha financing. We qualify for the max - and I'm happy to leverage our way into a multifamily. Uniquely, however, we need a true owners unit give the four person family I head (me, wife, and two young kids).
So, we found this place for $1.75 million.* It's a nice looking place - but how the hell do you make the numbers work? Turns out you don't. The itemized expenses are $12,000 a month against $8,000 of gross rents. So, expect a loss of at minimum $4k a month.
This is a triplex, with the main house assigned a rent of $3,400 a month. So that, we would need to expect to fund a housing cost to our family of $7,400 per month (3400 in "rent" to ourselves and another $4,000 in loss a month).
Then, I thought through - what about creative financing? What if we did an interest only balloon payment. Even then at a 5% interest only with a 10 year balloon, we'd have an annual finance cost of $87,500, or about $7,291.67 per month. With a traditional FHI mortgage the finance cost is PI of $8,057.74 plus another $850 for PMI; so nearly $9,000; the savings is about $1,800 a month, but that leaves a $2,200 a month loss - which is $26,400 in annual loss.
Now what is not on the analysis, however, is our tax issues. We would take the loss which would reduce our taxable income. We would gain access to a write-off of the property over its 27.5 year expected life. So, the annual depreciation on a $1.75 million purchase would be $1.75mm/27.5 years = $63,634.54 as a reduction from our income on the property. So that, instead of us being taxed on $190,000 of joint income, we would be taxed on ~$127k of income instead. In other words, about 1/3rd of the depreciation ($63,634.54 /3 = ~$21k) in taxes we don't send to washington or sacramento. But, even with an arguable (someone correct me if I've got it wrong please), tax benefit of $21k, we still end up about $49,000 LESS the $21k tax benefit still amounts to a $28k loss. i suppose that's the speculative payment for hoping that soCal real estate appreciates at the rates it has done since the early 1960s. I suspect one would not even break even on this property - even when including the tax benefit - for another 4-7 years.
-Craig.
____
* Yes, I'm aware FHA loans don't reach to $1.75 million - this is what generated me reviewing this deal to see how one could expect to do. I didn't want to get into the complex math of a seller carrying paper. Turns out, though, once I ran through the numbers - neither fHA nor private seemed to come close making a workable deal. The max fha loan for a fourplex in Oc is around $1.25 million for a fourplex.