Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

438
Posts
352
Votes
Marc C.
  • Buy-and-Hold Rental Investor
  • Santa Fe, NM
352
Votes |
438
Posts

Adding a purchase price contingency to the LOI...ideas?

Marc C.
  • Buy-and-Hold Rental Investor
  • Santa Fe, NM
Posted

Lately, we've been marketing directly to "mom and pop" owners who want to retire. Their books are usually more or less useless in a lot of ways: No management fee, no labor charges on repairs (they do their own), things that should be capex are listed as expenses, etc. What I ended up doing recently is just building my own APOD and including that with my LOI. It shows the expense ratio very clearly. In my LOI, I said, "The purchase price is subject to the property's actual expenses being no more than 40% of the property's actual rents."

I've toyed with making it about the tax returns: "The purchase price is based on our own estimates of the property's income and expenses and are subject to verification with the property's tax returns: We will pay the lowest of either the purchase price or 15 times the net income shown on the property's tax returns (not including amortization, depreciation, and loan payments.)" [i.e., a 7% cap rate]

One could also make it about the property's gross income: "The purchase price is based on our own estimates of the property's rents, but are subject to verification using the property's bank accounts: We agree to pay the highest of either the purchase price or 7 times the net rents which were deposited in the property's bank account in the past 12 mos." This one would be the easiest for the seller to understand. 

All 3 options are a little convoluted, but pointing out this contingency allows one to make an offer that is most attractive to the seller (say, near their asking price), but makes sure they understand it's all about the REAL numbers that they are going to have to share with us in the near future.

Curious if anyone else has tried this, or something similar, with their LOIs. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,822
Posts
15,766
Votes
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
15,766
Votes |
9,822
Posts
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
ModeratorReplied

I think it's too specific. If you want a financial out just word it as such, i.e. "Offer is contingent upon satisfactory verification of income and expenses by buyer, seller to provide in such acceptable form within X days", or something similar. If you've done your own homework, and you're buying at a great price, it's not going to matter all that much what the seller provides, and if you're buying at a terrible price, my question would be: why?

To be totally honest: I have never accepted any numbers provided by the seller. By the time we've reached contract, I already know to a reasonably strong level what my rehab/maintenance costs are going to be and what the potential market is for that unit. From my point of view, I couldn't care less if he/she rented the units for $1 or $10,000. 

business profile image
Skyline Properties

Loading replies...