Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
1
Votes
William Reed
  • Investor
  • Grovetown, GA
1
Votes |
15
Posts

5-Unit Listed as a 4-Unit - Is this cause for concern?

William Reed
  • Investor
  • Grovetown, GA
Posted

I am considering purchasing a multi-family property in Northern New York.  It's listed at $103k as a 4-Unit with an office, however the owners have the office rented as a 5th unit.  They told me that they don't report the 5th unit because the financing and taxes would have been greater because it would be considered a commercial property.  As a new investor, I'm concerned of the ethics of not reporting the 5th unit and assessing it properly but am not sure if I'm making too much of the situation.  I would imagine that a home inspection and appraisal would  uncover the fallacy.  Would it be best for me to finance it as a 5-unit or keep it as-is?  Personally, I would rather have a 5-unit because I can directly force the appreciation as opposed to a 4-unit that is dependent upon comps in the area.  

Would there be any ramifications on the current owners if it is assessed as a 5-unit during an appraisal?  The owners made it clear that their main goal with all of their investment properties was to avoid taxes (they've  informed us of some other practices where they don't report cash rent payments and income from a washer & dryer).  Ultimately, I want to be honest and transparent in all of my business practices - if it causes me to pay more in taxes and financing, so be it.  If anyone has any insight or advice, it would be greatly appreciated.

-Will

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

Hi @William Reed,

Sellers probably intend to have the 5th tenant not be there, and the oven removed, prior to the appraisal showing up. If you can't cook in it, it's not a 5th unit. And they will lean the bed up against the wall, throw a tarp over it, throw tarps or blankets over everything else, call it a storage area, etc. Not the newest trick in the book, oldie but a goodie. Now, if there is a residential tenant in there, with a lease in place, and this is hidden from the appraiser, they are being sneaky and naughty. I'm guessing you want no part of sneakiness? Good for you.

To cover YOUR butt and ensure YOU aren't committing fraud:

Without a 5th tenant and 5th oven, it's not a five unit. (I am not a lawyer, check with a lawyer, this is not legal advice) You can write in the contract "Property is a 4 unit building. Seller to deliver property as a 4 unit building, with no more than 4 kitchens, 4 tenants, and 4 leases in effect." The difference here is that their appraisal trick is sneaky, and if you know about then that could put your behind on the line too. So you don't want it merely "appraised as" a 4 unit, you want it DELIVERED as a 4 unit.

What he did, and how he got his mortgage before, how he makes that tenant go away, and if he exposes himself to liability for violating that 5th tenant's rights (both now, and historically), are not your concern. You just need to ensure that you aren't on the hook for any of it. New property owners inherit the lease, rights, responsibilities, obligations, etc, of the former owner, so you don't want tenant #5 in there, with a lease in place (verbal or otherwise), at closing.

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...