Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 9 years ago,
- Real Estate Broker
- 3412 S. Harlem Avenue Riverside, IL 60546
- 5,046
- Votes |
- 6,005
- Posts
Practice Multi Family Analysis 1
Hi BP community!
I am getting ready to, hopefully), buy my first commercial sized apartment building this year. In preparation, I will be practicing my underwriting skills on a closed multi deal in my target area every day. Today will be my first attempt, and I would love to get feedback on my analysis from you more experienced folks here. This deal is coming of the MLS, which I have access to as a broker. I am trying to figure out which parts of this pro forma data are completely out of line. This property was purchased by "Belgium Investments", so I doubt this is mom and pop group! Here it goes!
Property address: 5010 W. 18th street, Cicero, Illinois
Sold price: $665,000
Units: 19 1 and 2 bedroom units.
Rent Range: $600-775 (The MLS does not specify individual unit prices)
Gross Income: $164,700 (This seems really, really high... less than 1% vacancy in a C-/D area seems highly unlikely to me!)
Expenses: $52,355
-Janitor $400
-Water $11,000
-Repairs- $1000 (This seems so unlikely for a 19 unit!)
-Fuel- $10,200
-Scavenger- $2740
-Electric- $1800
-Insurance- $4400
-Taxes- $20,815
Net Operating Income: $112,345
Pro forma cap rate=17
Here is my take away from this. I believe that the expense are way too low. I also think that there are numbers missing. Obviously no property management is considered, but there is also no mention of snow removal or landscaping which I found out. The janitor expense seems interesting as well as I am not sure who charges $33 per month to clean a common area...
Here is what I would guess the building really looks like:
Gross income minus 10% vacancy factor= $148770
NOI using the 50% rule= $74,385
True cap rate then would be 11.4. Not bad, but not as rosy as the pro forma. So how did I do? Let me know your thoughts!