Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

59
Posts
12
Votes
Rob B.
  • San Leandro, CA
12
Votes |
59
Posts

Loan Terms

Rob B.
  • San Leandro, CA
Posted

I've been investing in SFRs for the past three years, but I'm trading up to start investing in small apartment complexes. We're about to close on a 16 unit apartment complex with assumable financing, which is fully amortized with another 23 years to go. 

I know that most MF loans are balloon payments after five years or something similar; my question is: is it common to refinance the loan or to get another loan when the balloon payment is due, or is it not worth it? What I love about real estate is that I can hold it for 10-20 years and I'll have a steady, exponential stream. Switching to Commercial Real Estate, I'm worried that those balloon payments might come due when the market is down or when I can't sell. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,176
Posts
11,259
Votes
Joel Owens
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
11,259
Votes |
15,176
Posts
Joel Owens
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
ModeratorReplied

Rob most of my clients go for non-recourse debt. If a property later experiences problems the lenders only recourse is against the property and not the borrower unless you violate the carve out provisions.

The non-recourse is good because the lenders are more apt to do a work out on the loan than take back a defaulted property.

Example you put down 1 million on a 4 million property. 5 years from now on a 10 year loan call the market is bad etc.  In this scenario you are worth 15 million. If you had full recourse the lender would say we do not care the property is losing money and you will pay the note or we will come after you etc.

If it's non-recourse it doesn't matter if you were worth 50 million they do not have access to that. The lender loses a lot of their negotiating leverage with  non-recourse on a problem property. 

business profile image
NNN Invest
5.0 stars
3 Reviews

Loading replies...