Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

93
Posts
13
Votes
Tou V.
  • Stockton, CA
13
Votes |
93
Posts

Northern Cali - 12 unit for 600k?

Tou V.
  • Stockton, CA
Posted

I'm fairly new to RE investing. Have been looking for MF properties for almost a year now. There just doesn't seem to be any within 200-300 miles which would seem like good investments. I've tried the 50% or 2% rule and there's really nothing around. Here is a scenario, let me know if it makes sense? I'm in Northern California.

Sales price = $600k for 12 units. Would put 30% down.

Monthly total rent = $8160

The seller has low expenses and I've seen the actual number, but doesn't mean future expenses will be the same.

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Palo Alto, CA
21
Votes |
49
Posts
Account Closed
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Palo Alto, CA
Replied

The seller's expenses won't be your expenses in the long run, so I recommend throwing them out and coming up with a new set of numbers based upon how you would operate the asset. Maybe you can get them lower, but you may also find that what you're seeing is artificially low for any number of reasons.

Loading replies...