Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Los Angeles, CA
4
Votes |
110
Posts

Questions about relocating tenants under rent control

Account Closed
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Working with an investor who wants to put an offer in on a 4-unit building in Los Angeles. NON-Owner occupied. 1 vacant unit. 3 occupied units each with equal rents that are about $700 under market rate, with long term tenants who's rent has never been raised.

2 questions -

1.) Are there any ways to relocate the tenants (with pay) other than moving family members in?

Another investor I know has purchased many similar buildings in the past and said he basically had to sway each tenant to move with money, and tells me it can be done with some convincing.

2.) Can the current rents be raised more than 3% since they've never been raised?

Thanks!

Loading replies...