Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

15,171
Posts
11,252
Votes
Joel Owens
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
11,252
Votes |
15,171
Posts

If you are thinking of flipping MULTIFAMILY read this!

Joel Owens
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Canton, GA
ModeratorPosted

So I work with a lot of clients analyzing properties.

A trend I am seeing is a critical mistake made by buyers of value add multifamily.

The larger number of unit buyers 50,100 units or larger do not typically make this mistake. I see it more in smaller 10,20,30 unit properties. The investor buys with the goal of selling with forced appreciation in a few years.

They go in basing pro-forma exit off of getting TOP MARKET rents after rehab. Unless you are in an extremely tight rental market which most places are not ( by tight I mean there are waiting lists at every complex in the area and rents are skyrocketing ) then you do not need to base a stabilization at the top of the market rents.

The goal of stabilizing after rehab is to lease up the FASTEST with the BEST tenants. I have seen a few properties recently where the owners have owned for about 3 years. They started asking out too much for rents after rehab and the absorption rate was slow ( absorption rate is how many units you are leasing up per month ). If you have 20 units for example and do one a month it might take close to 2 years to get fully occupied. If you are doing 4 a month full occupancy might occur in 6 months time.

The issue is these owners only had stabilized at 90% or better for 6 months which took them 3 years from date of purchase to accomplish. If they would have simply chose a nice rehab with middle market or lower rents and proper marketing the tenant demand would have been huge. You fill up fast and then increase annually. You take only the best tenants from screening taking away the best ones from other property owners.

The properties with the slow stabilizing times kill it for a seller because the lenders I know will not allow 75% ltv on a 6 month 90% occupancy seasoning. The banks feel the property has not had years of track record yet so some will do it but at 50% ltv. This could still work if the seller takes back a 25% second. The seller usually will not as that eats up all the equity in the forced appreciation. If a buyer has to dump down 50% then they will look at other larger properties with better scale.

So just something to consider if you are an investor trying to employ this strategy.

business profile image
NNN Invest
5.0 stars
3 Reviews

Loading replies...