Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Kenny Wang
0
Votes |
1
Posts

(3 unit + 2 ADUs) vs. (2 units + 2 ADUs)

Kenny Wang
Posted

Greetings!

Scenario A :  The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units. 

Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.

I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.

From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?

I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...

Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Kenny Wang:

Greetings!

Scenario A :  The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units. 

Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.

I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.

From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?

I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...

Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments! 


Actually, BOTH scenarios push this into commercial:

https://guide.freddiemac.com/app/guide/section/5601.2

See:

(a) Ineligible property types

Mortgages secured by the following property types are not eligible for purchase by Freddie Mac:

    A 2- or 3-unit property with an ADU that does not comply with zoning and land use requirements (illegal zoning)
  • A 1-, 2- or 3-unit property with two or more ADUs
  • A 4-unit property with an ADU
  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...