Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated 10 months ago on . Most recent reply
![Kenny Wang's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2218500/1694671541-avatar-kennyw47.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
(3 unit + 2 ADUs) vs. (2 units + 2 ADUs)
Greetings!
Scenario A : The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units.
Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.
I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.
From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?
I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...
Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments!
Most Popular Reply
![Chris Mason's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/376502/1621447632-avatar-chrism93.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=1015x1015@0x19/cover=128x128&v=2)
Quote from @Kenny Wang:
Greetings!
Scenario A : The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units.
Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.
I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.
From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?
I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...
Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments!
Actually, BOTH scenarios push this into commercial:
https://guide.freddiemac.com/app/guide/section/5601.2
See:
(a) Ineligible property typesMortgages secured by the following property types are not eligible for purchase by Freddie Mac:
- A 2- or 3-unit property with an ADU that does not comply with zoning and land use requirements (illegal zoning)
- A 1-, 2- or 3-unit property with two or more ADUs
- A 4-unit property with an ADU