Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

86
Posts
55
Votes
Adam M.
  • Investor
  • Texas (DFW & West Texas)
55
Votes |
86
Posts

Question on Earnest Money & Limited Partners

Adam M.
  • Investor
  • Texas (DFW & West Texas)
Posted

Hello! 

Genuinely seeking thoughts from the community here so please keep discussion open and positive :) ! 

Our firm has done many deals in the past with our own capital however we are now looking at taking down multifamily deals with limited partners for the first time, especially as our portfolio is pretty illiquid at the moment.

I myself as executive officer am doing everything I possibly can to make sure I learn about every nuance of the syndication process to make sure things go smoothly before even thinking about submitting any LOIs. As folks know once that timer starts ticking you have got to move! 

We have many soft commits from our LPs excited to work with us seeing as we have typically said no in the past (either we were not ready to take on investor dollars/wanted to build more of a solid foundation first) so we are excited to generate great returns for others that we have been able to do for ourselves for several years. 

That being said as I still have concerns as we explore syndications further: two being being earnest money and timing.

Let's say we're looking at a potential deal that has a purchase price of $13MM, so we would probably need to raise $5.5MM-ish  with a fixed rate agency loan product like a Fannie/Freddie and including renovation cost.

In a typical 1% EMD scenario we would need to come up with $130,000 shortly after executing the PSA. Seeing as sponsors use LPs to help them take on larger deals all the time, how do sponsors typically work with the EMD requirement? Is it included in the raise/LP equity and how does that work seeing as you usually send that in let's say 3 days after executing a PSA? Doesn't the raise happen only after you have executed a PSA?

If there are any other GPs out there that have worked through this problem I would really love to hear from you as I continue to build my knowledge about syndication timelines and execution. 

Many thanks and happy Tuesday! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,037
Posts
4,678
Votes
Taylor L.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • RVA
4,678
Votes |
5,037
Posts
Taylor L.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • RVA
Replied

EMD is a type of risk capital. Risk capital providers will expect to be compensated for the risk they take on. It's not part of the LP equity raise, you need it right away in order to get the deal under contract. Terms are negotiable. Many EMD providers will want GP and LP equity for their contribution.

As the name implies, risk capital carries significantly more risk than LP equity. If the deal doesn't close the EMD is often lost. Regular LP equity, should the deal not close, should be returned to investors in full.

Hard earnest money on Day 1 has become a common practice, meaning you can't get it back unless you can demonstrate fraud by the seller.

Loading replies...