Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

66
Posts
23
Votes
Jordan Northrup
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Stafford, VA
23
Votes |
66
Posts

Tax implications for Syndication LPs

Jordan Northrup
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Stafford, VA
Posted

I'm a partner on a $3M syndication deal in Northern Virginia. We have 4 General Partners and a very small number of LPs. I have a small ownership percentage; I will make a larger return by contributing $500,000 to the deal. In my LP role, I can expect a 25% annual return of $125,000. The problem is, I don't have $500,000...I have to raise it. 

I plan to offer "my investors" a smaller annual return of say....15%, meaning my return would essentially be the difference in 25%-15%. How should this be structure to minimize my tax liability? If this were to play out, I'd only be keeping $50,000 of the $125,000. Is there a way to pay taxes on my portion and not the whole amount?  

  • Jordan Northrup
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    17,995
    Posts
    17,195
    Votes
    J Scott
    • Investor
    • Sarasota, FL
    17,195
    Votes |
    17,995
    Posts
    J Scott
    • Investor
    • Sarasota, FL
    ModeratorReplied

    A couple thoughts:

    First, it's a violation of SEC rules for you to get compensated based on the amount of capital you bring to the deal (unless you're a licensed broker). So, make sure that you play some other roles in the deal that justify your compensation.

    Second, if you're looking to bring funds into the LP and take a fee/profit off of the top, you might want to consider creating a fund of funds, raising LP capital into your fund, and then deploying that capital into this deal and other deals.

    The structure of your fund will dictate what's returned to your investors versus what you keep, and there will be no commingling of funds that will make taxes complicated.  

    Also, that way you can be sure that your LPs have received the proper disclosures and there will be no confusion as to your role or the promote structure.

    Finally, I would most certainly consult with a good security's attorney to ensure that all this is being done legally and that you are not violating any SEC rules.

    Loading replies...